avr-libc-corelib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Avr-libc-corelib] proposed corelib style guide


From: Mike Perks
Subject: Re: [Avr-libc-corelib] proposed corelib style guide
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:34:19 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)

Ron
Oh dear. It's a pity we didn't all go to the same School for Programmers. I
name a type definition in upper case and instances in camel (where did this
"camel" come from?). However I agree exposed typedefs should conform to a
style. Please let's not add stuff like _t to names - what's the point?
We all come from different backgrounds and different coding standards. I believe we established for this project that we would be consistent with avr-libc even though some of us don't particularly like it's coding conventions (me included). In the name of making progress I understand this and am willing to live with it. The _t is a standard naming convention that other people use (including avr-libc).

Mike Perks
Oak Micros (oakmicros.com)






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]