[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] >4.5.1 better than this at register-structure (xmega)
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] >4.5.1 better than this at register-structure (xmega) access? |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Oct 2012 19:31:28 +0000 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden On
> Behalf Of Erik Walthinsen
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 1:22 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] >4.5.1 better than this at register-structure
> (xmega) access?
>
> FWIW, I *have* seen the compiler do the right thing with struct
> references in the past, but it was for either read or write (I don't
> remember which) and *not* the opposite. I have no idea what version of
> compiler it was unfortunately.
The biggest thing that you can do to help, is to help identify the specific
problem with a specific test case on known versions of the tools. The more
specifics we have, the easier it is to get into the code and find and fix the
bug.
Eric
- [avr-gcc-list] >4.5.1 better than this at register-structure (xmega) access?, Erik Walthinsen, 2012/10/10
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] >4.5.1 better than this at register-structure (xmega) access?, Georg-Johann Lay, 2012/10/10
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] >4.5.1 better than this at register-structure (xmega) access?, Erik Walthinsen, 2012/10/10
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] >4.5.1 better than this at register-structure (xmega) access?, Weddington, Eric, 2012/10/10
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] >4.5.1 better than this at register-structure (xmega) access?, Erik Walthinsen, 2012/10/10
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] >4.5.1 better than this at register-structure (xmega) access?, Erik Walthinsen, 2012/10/10
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] >4.5.1 better than this at register-structure (xmega) access?, Weddington, Eric, 2012/10/10
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] >4.5.1 better than this at register-structure (xmega) access?, Georg-Johann Lay, 2012/10/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] >4.5.1 better than this at register-structure (xmega) access?, David Kelly, 2012/10/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] >4.5.1 better than this at register-structure (xmega) access?, Erik Walthinsen, 2012/10/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] >4.5.1 better than this at register-structure (xmega) access?,
Weddington, Eric <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] >4.5.1 better than this at register-structure (xmega) access?, David Brown, 2012/10/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] >4.5.1 better than this at register-structure (xmega) access?, Georg-Johann Lay, 2012/10/12