Re: [avr-gcc-list] Bug or bad optimization?

avr-gcc-list

From:	E. Weddington
Subject:	Re: [avr-gcc-list] Bug or bad optimization?
Date:	Wed, 02 Mar 2005 10:35:19 -0700
User-agent:	Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803)

Jeff Epler wrote:

"volatile"?

Go look at a good C book, or ask on the comp.lang.c newsgroup.

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[avr-gcc-list] Bug or bad optimization?, Jim Davis, 2005/03/02
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Bug or bad optimization?, Zane D. Purvis, 2005/03/02
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Bug or bad optimization?, Jeff Epler, 2005/03/02
  - Re: [avr-gcc-list] Bug or bad optimization?, E. Weddington <=
    - [avr-gcc-list] Kindness and respect., Alan Kilian, 2005/03/02
    - Re: [avr-gcc-list] Kindness and respect., E. Weddington, 2005/03/02
    - RE: [avr-gcc-list] Kindness and respect., Jim Davis, 2005/03/02
    - Re: [avr-gcc-list] Kindness and respect., Jeff Barlow, 2005/03/02
    - Re: [avr-gcc-list] Kindness and respect., E. Weddington, 2005/03/02
    - [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc-list] Kindness and respect., Alan Kilian, 2005/03/02
    - Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc-list] Kindness and respect., David Brown, 2005/03/03
    - Re: [avr-gcc-list] Kindness and respect., Graham Davies, 2005/03/03
    - RE: [avr-gcc-list] Kindness and respect., Dave Hansen, 2005/03/02
    - RE: [avr-gcc-list] Kindness and respect., Jim Davis, 2005/03/02