avr-gcc-list
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [avr-chat] Re: [avr-gcc-list] OT: Like to recommend any other goo


From: E. Weddington
Subject: Re: [avr-chat] Re: [avr-gcc-list] OT: Like to recommend any other good AVR mailing lists?
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:31:33 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803)

address@hidden wrote:

  Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:43:42 -0700
  From: "E. Weddington" <address@hidden>
  To: Dave VanHorn <address@hidden>
  Subject: Re: [avr-chat]  Re: [avr-gcc-list] OT: Like to recommend any   other
   good AVR mailing lists?

Well, I'm a little more sanguine about it. AVR Freaks, I feel, has it's place. There's a number of good people there. It's a good place if you have fast question. I've noticed that a number of times questions don't get answered on avr-gcc-list, or at least it seems cyclical. There are times that avr-gcc-list is very quiet and then, like recently, a huge surge in traffic. AVR Freaks is a good place for newbies; they learn the ropes. I agree the name is almost embarassing, but I didn't choose it. One other nice thing, is that, *finally*, there are people from Atmel who are answering some questions on AVR Freaks, especially in regards to their AVR Studio software. I think it's getting monitored more by Atmel.

I also read the Usenet newsgroup comp.arch.embedded and Ulf Samuelsson
(address@hidden) responds there.  If you're not familiar with
newsgroups fire up outlook express and configure it according to your
internet service provider's instructions and take it for a spin.

Yup. I've seen him there too. :-)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]