Re: [avr-chat] Re: [avr-gcc-list] OT: Like to recommend any other good AVR mailing lists?

[E. Weddington]

Dave VanHorn wrote:

> > Ok, that would help.... But one also has to become a Yahoo "member". 
> > That's the last thing I need right now is another "membership".....
> >
> > At least with Jason's mailing lists, there are no corporate 
> > sponsorships....
> >
> > Also, it would be nice not to fracture the AVR community.
> >
> > Anyway, thanks for the advice.
>
>
> I agree on all counts.
> I despize the "forum" approach at "freaks", and the name grates on me 
> anyway..
> I'm a contractor, not a "freak".
LOL!

Well, I'm a little more sanguine about it. AVR Freaks, I feel, has it's 
place. There's a number of good people there. It's a good place if you 
have fast question. I've noticed that a number of times questions don't 
get answered on avr-gcc-list, or at least it seems cyclical. There are 
times that avr-gcc-list is very quiet and then, like recently, a huge 
surge in traffic. AVR Freaks is a good place for newbies; they learn the 
ropes. I agree the name is almost embarassing, but I didn't choose it. 
One other nice thing, is that, *finally*, there are people from Atmel 
who are answering some questions on AVR Freaks, especially in regards to 
their AVR Studio software. I think it's getting monitored more by Atmel.

Eric