avr-gcc-list
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [avr-chat] Re: [avr-gcc-list] OT: Like to recommend any other goo


From: rusty+avr-gcc-list
Subject: Re: [avr-chat] Re: [avr-gcc-list] OT: Like to recommend any other good AVR mailing lists?
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:26:46 -0800 (PST)

   Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:43:42 -0700
   From: "E. Weddington" <address@hidden>
   To: Dave VanHorn <address@hidden>
   Subject: Re: [avr-chat]  Re: [avr-gcc-list] OT: Like to recommend any   other
    good AVR mailing lists?

   Well, I'm a little more sanguine about it. AVR Freaks, I feel, has it's 
   place. There's a number of good people there. It's a good place if you 
   have fast question. I've noticed that a number of times questions don't 
   get answered on avr-gcc-list, or at least it seems cyclical. There are 
   times that avr-gcc-list is very quiet and then, like recently, a huge 
   surge in traffic. AVR Freaks is a good place for newbies; they learn the 
   ropes. I agree the name is almost embarassing, but I didn't choose it. 
   One other nice thing, is that, *finally*, there are people from Atmel 
   who are answering some questions on AVR Freaks, especially in regards to 
   their AVR Studio software. I think it's getting monitored more by Atmel.

I also read the Usenet newsgroup comp.arch.embedded and Ulf Samuelsson
(address@hidden) responds there.  If you're not familiar with
newsgroups fire up outlook express and configure it according to your
internet service provider's instructions and take it for a spin.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]