[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh
From: |
Noah Misch |
Subject: |
Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:17:50 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 02:34:13PM +0400, Roman Rybalko wrote:
> I invoked aclocal and expect it will respect ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS in
> Makefile.am - but it doesn't.
>
> So, as I can see, ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS works only for autoreconf (and some
> other tools), but not to aclocal.
> Is it correct ?
Correct.
- autoreconf vs autogen.sh, David Bruce, 2007/08/24
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Benoit SIGOURE, 2007/08/25
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Roman Rybalko, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Benoit SIGOURE, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Roman Rybalko, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Roman Rybalko, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh,
Noah Misch <=
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Andreas Schwab, 2007/08/27
Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Noah Misch, 2007/08/25
Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/08/25