[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh
From: |
Roman Rybalko |
Subject: |
Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:34:13 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728) |
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> If there is something you tried and it did not work as expected, then
> please show what you did so we can try to reproduce it.
>
>
Here it is:
I invoked aclocal and expect it will respect ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS in
Makefile.am - but it doesn't.
So, as I can see, ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS works only for autoreconf (and some
other tools), but not to aclocal.
Is it correct ?
PS: Thx for docs. It's really usable. I'll read asap.
test.tgz
Description: application/compressed-tar
- autoreconf vs autogen.sh, David Bruce, 2007/08/24
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Benoit SIGOURE, 2007/08/25
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Roman Rybalko, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Benoit SIGOURE, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Roman Rybalko, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh,
Roman Rybalko <=
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Noah Misch, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Andreas Schwab, 2007/08/27
Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Noah Misch, 2007/08/25
Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/08/25