Generators let you say '[f(x) for x in someCollection()]' in types other than the pre-defined axiom ones. The type Generator represents a possibly unbounded sequence of values (like Stream, but with
Greetings! Thank you so much for this. If you have time, it would be msot helpful to give a brief example showing how each of these enhancements works. Nice idea. Heard good things about Zebu, but no
If there's a rewrite of Spad using a little more of aldor, then I'd also be interested in helping occasionaly (unless a really freely available Aldor comes along). I guess you've missed generators, e
Good work! Since daase calls pathname-name all over the place could it be related to this email exchange between Tim Daly and Camm Maquire? [Gcl-devel] pathname-name behavior change http://lists.gnu.
Found it - aldor is being picky about the case of file names; it (effectively) requires that aldor file names should be all lower case. I'm not precisely sure what is doing the downcasing; I suspect
In http://www.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/SandBoxCategoryOfGraphs I am trying to define the category of graphs in Aldor. When I try to use this category in the definition of the domain of Fin
Since you are the master of MathAction, I believe you, although I don't quite understand. Did I understand correctly: Currently you save the content of every section into a file and then you say some
Martin, Peter, I tried to build aldor last night. I succeeded in building the compiler but not the libraries. I have a CVS checkout from May 16. I've been reading the Makefiles but they all seem to d
Martin, I have been thinking about your example code. I don't really understand when the use of parameterized return types on functions would be useful. What information is being returned as part of
As long as you don't use the sig. from the interpreter, you will be ok (which misses the point,, I know). As far as fixing the error, not really, I don't know the axiom interpreter that well. Finding
Dear Peter, this is just great stuff -- nearly... I had to try it out right away, but I experienced two problems. the minor one is, that )co inside axiom still does not work: AXIOM Computer Algebra S
Greetings! As Tim said, likely not in the sense you mean. But if axiom is built on gcl, you can compile your code, load the .o file, and )lisp (si::save-system "foo") to get a standalone foo executab
cvs -d:pserver:address@hidden:/projects/axiom login cvs -d:pserver:address@hidden:/projects/axiom co axiom This timed out for me, but cvs -z3 -d:ext:address@hidden:/cvsroot/axiom co axiom worked. Ald
Greetings! Just a note here -- this is a gcl source tarball, not an executable. If you need access to gcl independently, please check out http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/boyer/gcl (at present) and ftp
There is an Aldor project, but it is not open source. I can see that Axiom is, but the only tarball I could find was from the Debian project, and it fails on make with "gcl-2.6.1.tgz: Cannot open: No
Stephen, Welcome back. I believe that Bill, Mike and myself are all interested in Aldor for various platforms, including Windows. If you send the emails to address@hidden you will end up copying all
I am working my way through my pile of Axiom historical documentation. I found one of the early Aldor design docs. https://github.com/daly/PDFS/blob/master/AldorDesign.pdf
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 5:32 PM, <address@hidden> wrote: >I found this page: I was unaware this took place. Tim My recollection was that it was widely advertised to the larger AXIOM community -- all f