[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/licenses gpl-faq.fr.html po/gpl-faq.fr-en.html
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www/licenses gpl-faq.fr.html po/gpl-faq.fr-en.html |
|
Date: |
Wed, 26 Dec 2018 04:29:02 -0500 (EST) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 18/12/26 04:29:02
Modified files:
licenses : gpl-faq.fr.html
licenses/po : gpl-faq.fr-en.html
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/gpl-faq.fr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.174&r2=1.175
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.fr-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.86&r2=1.87
Patches:
Index: gpl-faq.fr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/gpl-faq.fr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.174
retrieving revision 1.175
diff -u -b -r1.174 -r1.175
--- gpl-faq.fr.html 15 Dec 2018 14:46:14 -0000 1.174
+++ gpl-faq.fr.html 26 Dec 2018 09:29:01 -0000 1.175
@@ -4130,7 +4130,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Dernière mise à jour :
-$Date: 2018/12/15 14:46:14 $
+$Date: 2018/12/26 09:29:01 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: po/gpl-faq.fr-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.fr-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.86
retrieving revision 1.87
diff -u -b -r1.86 -r1.87
--- po/gpl-faq.fr-en.html 15 Dec 2018 14:46:18 -0000 1.86
+++ po/gpl-faq.fr-en.html 26 Dec 2018 09:29:01 -0000 1.87
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
<li><a href="#AssignCopyright">Why does the FSF require that
contributors to FSF-copyrighted programs assign copyright to the
- FSF? If I hold copyright on a GPL'ed program, should I do this,
+ FSF? If I hold copyright on a GPLed program, should I do this,
too? If so, how?</a></li>
<li><a href="#ModifyGPL">Can I modify the GPL and make a modified
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@
<li><a href="#WhatDoesWrittenOfferValid">What does “written offer
valid for any third party” mean in GPLv2? Does that mean everyone
- in the world can get the source to any GPL'ed program no matter
+ in the world can get the source to any GPLed program no matter
what?</a></li>
<li><a href="#TheGPLSaysModifiedVersions">The GPL says that modified
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@
and/or notify me?</a></li>
<li><a href="#DoesTheGPLRequireAvailabilityToPublic">If I distribute
- GPL'd software for a fee, am I required to also make it available to
+ GPLed software for a fee, am I required to also make it available to
the public without a charge?</a></li>
<li><a href="#DoesTheGPLAllowNDA">Does the GPL allow me to
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@
<li><a href="#AssignCopyright">Why does the FSF require that
contributors to FSF-copyrighted programs assign copyright to the
- FSF? If I hold copyright on a GPL'ed program, should I do this,
+ FSF? If I hold copyright on a GPLed program, should I do this,
too? If so, how?</a></li>
<li><a href="#GPLCommercially">If I use a piece of software that has
@@ -410,12 +410,12 @@
GPL?</a></li>
<li><a href="#CompanyGPLCostsMoney">I just found out that a company
- has a copy of a GPL'ed program, and it costs money to get it.
+ has a copy of a GPLed program, and it costs money to get it.
Aren't they violating the GPL by not making it available on the
Internet?</a></li>
<li><a href="#UnreleasedMods">A company is running a modified
- version of a GPL'ed program on a web site. Does the GPL say they
+ version of a GPLed program on a web site. Does the GPL say they
must release their modified sources?</a></li>
<li><a href="#UnreleasedModsAGPL">A company is running a modified
@@ -570,7 +570,7 @@
(not the LGPL), does that mean that any software which uses it has to
be under the GPL or a GPL-compatible license?</a></li>
- <li><a href="#LinkingWithGPL">You have a GPL'ed program that I'd
+ <li><a href="#LinkingWithGPL">You have a GPLed program that I'd
like to link with my code to build a proprietary program. Does the
fact that I link with your program mean I have to GPL my
program?</a></li>
@@ -648,7 +648,7 @@
I combine or link Q with a GPL-covered program?</a></li>
<li><a href="#OOPLang">In an object-oriented language such as Java,
- if I use a class that is GPL'ed without modifying, and subclass it,
+ if I use a class that is GPLed without modifying, and subclass it,
in what way does the GPL affect the larger program?</a></li>
<li><a href="#NonfreeDriverKernelLinux">Does distributing a
@@ -687,14 +687,14 @@
GPL?</a></li>
<li><a href="#HeardOtherLicense">I heard that someone got a copy of
- a GPL'ed program under another license. Is this possible?</a></li>
+ a GPLed program under another license. Is this possible?</a></li>
<li><a href="#DeveloperViolate">Is the developer of a GPL-covered
program bound by the GPL? Could the developer's actions ever be a
violation of the GPL?</a></li>
<li><a href="#CompanyGPLCostsMoney">I just found out that a company
- has a copy of a GPL'ed program, and it costs money to get it.
+ has a copy of a GPLed program, and it costs money to get it.
Aren't they violating the GPL by not making it available on the
Internet?</a></li>
@@ -861,7 +861,7 @@
<dt id="WhatDoesWrittenOfferValid">What does “written offer
valid for any third party” mean in GPLv2? Does that mean
- everyone in the world can get the source to any GPL'ed program
+ everyone in the world can get the source to any GPLed program
no matter what?
<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#WhatDoesWrittenOfferValid"
>#WhatDoesWrittenOfferValid</a>)</span></dt>
@@ -988,7 +988,7 @@
<dt id="DoesTheGPLRequireAvailabilityToPublic">If I
- distribute GPL'd software for a fee, am I required to also make
+ distribute GPLed software for a fee, am I required to also make
it available to the public without a charge?
<span class="anchor-reference-id">
(<a href="#DoesTheGPLRequireAvailabilityToPublic"
@@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@
<dd><p> No, this is not permitted under the terms of the GPL. While we
recognize that proper citation is an important part of academic
publications, citation cannot be added as an additional requirement to
-the GPL. Requiring citation in research papers which made use of GPL'd
+the GPL. Requiring citation in research papers which made use of GPLed
software goes beyond what would be an acceptable additional
requirement under section 7(b) of GPLv3, and therefore would be
considered an additional restriction under Section 7 of the GPL. And
@@ -1441,7 +1441,7 @@
<dt id="HeardOtherLicense">I heard that someone got a copy
- of a GPL'ed program under another license. Is this possible?
+ of a GPLed program under another license. Is this possible?
<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#HeardOtherLicense"
>#HeardOtherLicense</a>)</span></dt>
<dd><p>
@@ -1584,15 +1584,15 @@
version: v2, v2.1 or v3): </p>
<blockquote>
- <p>(1) If you statically link against an LGPL'd library, you must
+ <p>(1) If you statically link against an LGPLed library, you must
also provide your application in an object (not necessarily source)
format, so that a user has the opportunity to modify the library and
relink the application.</p>
-<p>(2) If you dynamically link against an LGPL'd library <em>already
+<p>(2) If you dynamically link against an LGPLed library <em>already
present on the user's computer</em>, you need not convey the library's
source. On the other hand, if you yourself convey the executable
-LGPL'd library along with your application, whether linked with
+LGPLed library along with your application, whether linked with
statically or dynamically, you must also convey the library's sources,
in one of the ways for which the LGPL provides.</p>
</blockquote></dd>
@@ -1718,7 +1718,7 @@
many Java classes. These libraries and the programs that call them
are always dynamically linked together.</p>
-<p>A consequence is that if you choose to use GPL'd Perl modules or Java
+<p>A consequence is that if you choose to use GPLed Perl modules or Java
classes in your program, you must release the program in a
GPL-compatible way, regardless of the license used in the Perl or Java
interpreter that the combined Perl or Java program will run on.
@@ -1856,7 +1856,7 @@
writing free software that uses a nonfree library.</a></p></dd>
-<dt id="LinkingWithGPL">You have a GPL'ed program that I'd like
+<dt id="LinkingWithGPL">You have a GPLed program that I'd like
to link with my code to build a proprietary program. Does the fact
that I link with your program mean I have to GPL my program?
<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#LinkingWithGPL"
@@ -2013,7 +2013,7 @@
<dt id="AssignCopyright">Why does
the FSF require that contributors to FSF-copyrighted programs assign
- copyright to the FSF? If I hold copyright on a GPL'ed program, should
+ copyright to the FSF? If I hold copyright on a GPLed program, should
I do this, too? If so, how?
<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#AssignCopyright"
>#AssignCopyright</a>)</span></dt>
@@ -2409,7 +2409,7 @@
<dt id="UnreleasedMods">A company
- is running a modified version of a GPL'ed program on a web site.
+ is running a modified version of a GPLed program on a web site.
Does the GPL say they must release their modified sources?
<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#UnreleasedMods"
>#UnreleasedMods</a>)</span></dt>
@@ -2422,7 +2422,7 @@
href="#UnreleasedModsAGPL">GNU Affero GPL</a>.</p>
<p>Compare this to a situation where the web site contains or links to
-separate GPL'ed programs that are distributed to the user when they
+separate GPLed programs that are distributed to the user when they
visit the web site (often written in <a
href="/philosophy/javascript-trap.html">JavaScript</a>, but other
languages are used as well). In this situation the source code for the
@@ -2854,13 +2854,13 @@
<dt id="OOPLang">In an object-oriented language such as Java,
- if I use a class that is GPL'ed without modifying, and subclass it,
+ if I use a class that is GPLed without modifying, and subclass it,
in what way does the GPL affect the larger program?
<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#OOPLang"
>#OOPLang</a>)</span></dt>
<dd><p>
Subclassing is creating a derivative work. Therefore, the terms of
-the GPL affect the whole program where you create a subclass of a GPL'ed
+the GPL affect the whole program where you create a subclass of a GPLed
class.
</p></dd>
@@ -2897,7 +2897,7 @@
<dt id="CompanyGPLCostsMoney">I just found out that a company has a
- copy of a GPL'ed program, and it costs money to get it. Aren't they
+ copy of a GPLed program, and it costs money to get it. Aren't they
violating the GPL by not making it available on the Internet?
<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#CompanyGPLCostsMoney"
>#CompanyGPLCostsMoney</a>)</span></dt>
@@ -2987,7 +2987,7 @@
software.</p></dd>
-<dt id="ExportWarranties">Some distributors of GPL'd software
+<dt id="ExportWarranties">Some distributors of GPLed software
require me in their umbrella EULAs or as part of their downloading
process to “represent and warrant” that I am located in
the US or that I intend to distribute the software in compliance with
@@ -3941,7 +3941,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2018/12/15 14:46:18 $
+$Date: 2018/12/26 09:29:01 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/licenses gpl-faq.fr.html po/gpl-faq.fr-en.html,
GNUN <=