[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [vile] vile-9.7q.patch.gz
From: |
Paul Fox |
Subject: |
Re: [vile] vile-9.7q.patch.gz |
Date: |
Wed, 27 May 2009 10:40:05 -0400 |
thomas wrote:
> On Wed, 27 May 2009, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>
> >> P.S. I'm not really looking forward to chmod'ing all my .vile* stuff
> >> on dozens of machines, but OK. :)
> >
> > I'll also check and see if there's some reliable indication that
> > the privacy groups are setup.
>
> as an afterthought, I _could_ make vile limit the permissions and
> just tell you about it...
i don't think either of those things is necessary. seems to me
that if the user has set their $HOME-based dot-files to allow
group write, then they have a reason. insecure dotfiles in other
places (i.e., current dir) should probably be more-stringent, and
turning on popup-messages when one is discovered (and is being
ignored) is probably the best solution i've heard.
paul
=---------------------
paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 47.5 degrees)
- [vile] vile-9.7q.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2009/05/18
- Re: [vile] vile-9.7q.patch.gz, Paul van Tilburg, 2009/05/26
- Re: [vile] vile-9.7q.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2009/05/26
- Re: [vile] vile-9.7q.patch.gz, Paul van Tilburg, 2009/05/27
- Re: [vile] vile-9.7q.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2009/05/27
- Re: [vile] vile-9.7q.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2009/05/27
- Re: [vile] vile-9.7q.patch.gz, Paul van Tilburg, 2009/05/27
- Re: [vile] vile-9.7q.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2009/05/27
- Re: [vile] vile-9.7q.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2009/05/27
- Re: [vile] vile-9.7q.patch.gz,
Paul Fox <=
- Re: [vile] vile-9.7q.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2009/05/27
- Re: [vile] vile-9.7q.patch.gz, Steven Lembark, 2009/05/27
- Re: [vile] vile-9.7q.patch.gz, Paul van Tilburg, 2009/05/27
- Re: [vile] vile-9.7q.patch.gz, Steven Lembark, 2009/05/27
- Re: [vile] vile-9.7q.patch.gz, Steven Lembark, 2009/05/27
- Re: [vile] vile-9.7q.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2009/05/27
- Re: [vile] vile-9.7q.patch.gz, Steven Lembark, 2009/05/27