Re: [Social-discuss] Languages -- let's make a web application

[Ted Smith]

On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 18:20 +0100, Rob Myers wrote:
> On 29/03/10 15:30, Ted Smith wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 08:04 -0400, Rob Myers wrote:
> >> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 06:29:37 +0200 (CEST), Carlo von Loesch
> >> <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>> Matt Lee typeth:
> >>> | This is also why I think something in a browser would be more
> >>> | understandable by a typical user.
> >>>
> >>> A user also understands a Skype client or a bittorrent plugin.
> >>> Maybe he even understands a Jabber client.
> >>>
> >>> The choice of tools is not limited by mental capacities yet.
> >>> The question is how much are you intending to through encryption,
> >>> thus privacy, out of the window.
> >>
> >> We're not. 
> 
> By which double negative I mean that we are *not* planning to throw
> privacy out of the window.

As I said to Matt: This was a reading comprehension failure on my part.
Sorry for implying you were privacy-opposed. I'll be more careful in the
future.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part