|Subject:||Re: [rdiff-backup-users] fuzzy match - moved/renamed|
|Date:||Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:08:20 +0100|
|User-agent:||Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1|
I've to admit that generally would agree with "disk is cheaper than time/cpu" as long as it is "close enough" that bandwidth doesn't play a role.
It becomes major headache if scenario drives one to pump unnecessary xxx GBs of data on daily basis and disaster recovery site is accessible through 20Mbps link. (rdiff-backup does not finish within 24h).
Than the time to calculate data locally since CPU is cheap changes the story completely and it is worth to do local calculation and discover moves.
This is what drove me towards posting this question.
On 2016-02-10 1:57, Dave Kempe wrote:
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|