|Subject:||Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Maintenance|
|Date:||Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:36:03 +0100|
|User-agent:||Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5|
Ned, re the verification issue, I suggest you look back in mailing
list archives to a post entitled 'Verify times increasing' by Daniel
Miller on 20 November 2009, and the follow-up posts. He then started
a thread 'Implementing new features' on 3 February 2010 and then a
thread 'New feature: --verify-full' on 11 February 2010. Lastly a
thread 'Restarting development ... or starting over' on 5 April
Daniel coded a modified version of rdiff-backup which allowed full subsequent verification, but then started a new project to match and improve on the features of rdiff-backup which AFAIK was never published. You might be able to reach him for more info.
I know nothing about the internal coding of rdiff-backup, I'm afraid, maybe someone else here does?
On 28/04/2013 18:34, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: Dominic Raferd [mailto:address@hidden] I might be able to get you an email address for him though. Failing that I guessyoucould create a fork.Thanks, I was able to reach Ben Escoto, who gave me an address for Andrew @ princeton.edu. Ben has long since been a non-maintainer, but he at least still has admin access to the project, so if Andrew proves to be unavailable for some reason, we should be able to at least able to resurrect access without being forced into the fork. That was only today, so the fact that I don't have a response yet is irrelevant. The fact that I don't have a bounce yet is highly relevant. ;-) Still, if you've got another address for Andrew, that would be appreciated.There is a wish-list somewhere (quite a long and old one I'm afraid).That's the thing about volunteer effort. People are motivated to work on whatever they care about. ;-)Some of the recurrent issues relate to backups to/on Windows filesystemsorsaving/recovering Windows ACLs.Unfortunately, I think I'm unlikely to focus much on the windows side of things... I personally pay $17 to goodsync once every couple of years and I'm happy with that for windows.One serious failing in rdiff-backup is its verification procedures which are rather inadequate.That does sound important. Could you expand? (I haven't dug into source much yet.)Someone else looked at the rdiff-backup codebase a while back and said it was very untidy and repetitious and they lost interest in updating it.Justwarning you before you get stuck in! But you would be performing a great service...Yeah, in the quick look I had already at the source code, there seemed to be a lot of indirection ... Which is confusing without a map, but if there's a good block diagram illustrating the interfaces between the zillion tiny little classes etc, that goes a long way toward making it all clear.
TimeDicer: Free File Recovery from Whenever
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|