[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [nmh-workers] Flagging messages
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [nmh-workers] Flagging messages |
Date: |
Mon, 27 May 2019 12:34:12 -0400 |
> | IBM mainfraimes with RECFM=FB, LRECL=80 (the classic format
> | for punchcards)? Don't forget the EBCDIC encoding fun :-)
>
>Oh, I know systems with fixed lenght records exist(ed). The question
>was whether any of them actually did anything which pretended to be
>RFC822 format e-mail (and used fixed length record files to do it).
I remember those systems well, but AFAIK when they communicated via
email with the rest of the world they sent "standard" RFC 822 messages,
with no funny stuff like completely blank lines. Well, besides the eternal
confusion of ASCII<->EBCDIC character mapping :-)
--Ken
- Re: [nmh-workers] Flagging messages, (continued)
Re: [nmh-workers] Flagging messages, Valdis Klētnieks, 2019/05/25
- Re: [nmh-workers] Flagging messages, Ralph Corderoy, 2019/05/26
- Re: [nmh-workers] Flagging messages, Robert Elz, 2019/05/26
- Re: [nmh-workers] Flagging messages, Ken Hornstein, 2019/05/26
- Re: [nmh-workers] Flagging messages, Robert Elz, 2019/05/27
- Re: [nmh-workers] Flagging messages, Robert Elz, 2019/05/27
- Re: [nmh-workers] Flagging messages,
Ken Hornstein <=
Re: [nmh-workers] Flagging messages, Wolfgang Denk, 2019/05/27
Re: [nmh-workers] Flagging messages, Andy Bradford, 2019/05/27