Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address

[Kevin Cosgrove]

On 31 August 2015 at 13:10, Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> wrote:

> >I run into this at work, primarily from a co-worker running Mutt.  While I
> >pointed out that this is not valid and pointed to the spec, he has not
> >fixed it as it does not break for anyone else.
> >
> >How hard would it be to enhance the code to not error out in this
> >situation.  There is a valid e-mail address present.
> 
> I thought we did fix it?  At least for some cases; take a gander at
> the address parser code and you'll see what I mean.
> 
> As for fixing it ... take a gander at the address parser code, that
> should answer your question.

In my OP I mentioned that I'm running nmh-1.5.  I looked at the 
website just now and see that I'm a minor version behind.  I'll build 
1.6 and see how that behaves.

Thanks....

--
Kevin