[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address

From: Ralph Corderoy
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 19:11:53 +0100


Lyndon wrote:
> What Jon meant was "don't crash when your code encounters garbage
> input," and was written in the context of the IMPs tipping over when
> receiving invalid packets.  It *never* meant "second guess the
> sender's intent and patch accordingly."

Right.  And ISTM an even worse idea to attempt that in today's world of
folks trying to exploit flaws.  If they can't follow our RFCs, we don't
want their emails!  ;-)

Cheers, Ralph.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]