[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:07:47 -0500 |
>How does that look? More code rework, but it feels better. Also, with this
>I think it actually accomplishes what you want (attach + inspection).
One additional thing ... I'd like to get rid of the ability of specifing
the header name and just go with Nmh-Attachment. I realize that's an
artifact of the current implementation, but I don't see the value in changing
the header name, and supporting THAT requires passing down the header name
to mhbuild. I'd rather just hardcode it, document it, and leave it as-is.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, Paul Fox, 2013/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, Paul Fox, 2013/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, Paul Fox, 2013/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, Jon Steinhart, 2013/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, Ken Hornstein, 2013/12/16