[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Dec 2013 14:52:14 +0000 |
Hi Ken,
> Well, let me make this alternate proposal:
>
> - "attach" adds Nmh-Attachment headers as per usual. Maybe we'll add
> something like: "attaching foo.pdf to message as application/pdf" so
> the user can see what MIME type is being used (really, that's all I
> care about).
>
> - You can add or not add mhbuild directives to the message if you
> want.
>
> - If you add mhbuild directives, you can run "mime" (also, you can run
> "mime" even if you don't). mhbuild will be in charge of processing
> Nmh-Attachment headers. If there are mhbuild directives, they get
> added per usual; any content specified by Nmh-Attachment headers gets
> appended to the message after all other content. This is a
> significant change to the _implementation_, but it feels like where
> that functionality should belong.
>
> - If you try to "attach" after a "mime", you get an error.
>
> - send runs "mhbuild -auto -nodirectives". "-auto" means, "don't
> error out if there's a MIME-Version header, just don't process the
> draft". "-nodirectives" means "don't process directives". But ...
> Nmh-Attachment headers are still processed.
>
> How does that look? More code rework, but it feels better. Also,
> with this I think it actually accomplishes what you want (attach +
> inspection).
Looks good. I can't think of any problems at the moment.
Cheers, Ralph.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, norm, 2013/12/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, Ken Hornstein, 2013/12/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, Ken Hornstein, 2013/12/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/12/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, Ken Hornstein, 2013/12/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, Jon Steinhart, 2013/12/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, Paul Fox, 2013/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, Paul Fox, 2013/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, Paul Fox, 2013/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, Jon Steinhart, 2013/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, Ken Hornstein, 2013/12/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, Rickard Carlsson, 2013/12/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/12/16