Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach

[Jon Steinhart]

Ken Hornstein writes:
> >How does that look?  More code rework, but it feels better.  Also, with this
> >I think it actually accomplishes what you want (attach + inspection).
> 
> One additional thing ... I'd like to get rid of the ability of specifing
> the header name and just go with Nmh-Attachment.  I realize that's an
> artifact of the current implementation, but I don't see the value in changing
> the header name, and supporting THAT requires passing down the header name
> to mhbuild.  I'd rather just hardcode it, document it, and leave it as-is.
> 
> --Ken

I originally made it configurable because there was no guaranteed way to avoid
conflicts with non-standard headers.