[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Updates to nmh
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Updates to nmh |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:02:25 -0500 |
>Haven't investigated yet, but there's definitely a bug in there. When
>I try to use this version of nmh it won't let me send any mail:
>
>What now? w
> -- Network Recipients --
> pm215 at localhost
>
>What now? s
>send: message not delivered to anyone
So ... what MTS are you using? SMTP? Or sendmail? Does "-snoop" tell you
anything useful? I thought what I did only affected the SMTP MTS, but
hey, I've been wrong before.
>I also noticed a compile warning:
>./client.c: In function âclientâ:
>./client.c:88: warning: passing argument 6 of âgetnameinfoâ makes integer
>from pointer without a cast
I guess technically that should be "0". I forget on some el-lamo systems
NULL is not defined as 0, but includes a cast to (void *). Should be
harmless, though. Guess I missed it in the bazillion warnings about
mismatches between unsigned char * and signed char *.
--Ken
- [Nmh-workers] Updates to nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2009/01/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Updates to nmh, Joel Uckelman, 2009/01/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Updates to nmh, Doug Porter, 2009/01/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Updates to nmh, Peter Maydell, 2009/01/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Updates to nmh,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Updates to nmh, Peter Maydell, 2009/01/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Updates to nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2009/01/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Updates to nmh, Peter Maydell, 2009/01/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Updates to nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2009/01/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Updates to nmh, Robert Elz, 2009/01/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Updates to nmh, Anders Eriksson, 2009/01/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Updates to nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2009/01/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Updates to nmh, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2009/01/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Updates to nmh, Peter Maydell, 2009/01/25
- [Nmh-workers] Re: Updates to nmh, Bill Wohler, 2009/01/25