[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Nmh status - working on nmh

From: Neil W Rickert
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] Nmh status - working on nmh
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 11:02:13 -0500

Jon Steinhart <address@hidden> wrote on Sep 16, 2004:

>Is there any sort of wish list for nmh development?

Here is my wish list.

nmh is rotten at the core.  There is a lot of cruft, and probably
buffer overflows galore in the many library routines.

What is badly needed (IMHO) is to document the various procedures,
and carefully review the code in each of them.  It will be easier to
add enhancements, when the core library is in better shape and is
adequately documented.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]