[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Nmh status - working on nmh

From: Bill Wohler
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] Nmh status - working on nmh
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 22:20:02 -0700

Chad Walstrom <address@hidden> wrote:

> Neil W Rickert wrote:
> > nmh is rotten at the core.  There is a lot of cruft, and probably
> > buffer overflows galore in the many library routines.
> Please excuse my blasphemous inquiry.  Has anyone looked at the GNU
> project "mailutils"?

Yes, we (the MH-E project) have added GNU mailutils support so its MH
support appears to be complete. I haven't personally used it though.

I don't know if GNU mailutils would be a good next-generation nmh or
not. Perhaps someone might be able to expand upon this.

Bill Wohler <address@hidden>  http://www.newt.com/wohler/  GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]