[Monotone-devel] Re: Announcing "m7", a monotone front-end... which adds revision numbers!

[Lapo Luchini]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Larry Hastings wrote:
> Let me be clear: I am hardly opposed to changing these tags to custom
> certs.  Indeed, that could offer its own advantages.  But I am curious
> about the reaction of the general *monotone* community.  I am now well
> acquainted with Mr. Levitte's opinion; what do the rest of you think?

I, for me, have already a bit of a "hate" problem with a couple of
"version only" tags on viewmtn.angrygoats.net (specifically
"0.5-release" and "popt-1.7", plus a couple of "t:") and wuoldn't like
very much that list cluttering up.
OTOH if they had an easy-to-filter name I could live with them.
But I'm a bit paranoid about "order" (in the digital environment,
whoever has seen my room can state quite STRONGLY I don't care for order
in the real world ;-)) so probably I'b a bit biased.

(by the way, when cvs_import imports tags it could be nice enough to add
branch name to them, in order to avoid clashes.. but OTOH I can
kill_tag_locally and re-create any tag with a better name I want, and of
course there's not "real" way to have an automatic tool import tags in a
"sensible" way anyway)

- --
L a p o   L u c h i n i
l a p o @ l a p o . i t
w w w . l a p o . i t /
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkM5YKcACgkQaJiCLMjyUvv3mACeNrC/AvIxfjvB6Iw46MEUbaOE
PGAAoOYpvGgSgMN25H6Xg1i/gJbcUepf
=4+df
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----