[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Monotone-devel] Re: Branch naming conventions
From: |
Bruce Stephens |
Subject: |
[Monotone-devel] Re: Branch naming conventions |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Dec 2004 22:31:45 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Nathan Myers <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
> It's something that you and every other programmer who might possibly
> use monotone is very, very used to. The only people who have ever
> even seen the other are Java coders. (Any of _them_ who don't think
> it's whacked will be managers or Walmart stockboys soon enough.)
There are X.500 distinguished names. Amusingly, both big-endian and
little-endian syntaxes exist
(<http://java.sun.com/products/jndi/tutorial/ldap/models/x500.html>
shows an example of each). My impression is that little-endian is
winning, for what it's worth.
Another example might be file paths, where everyone always used
big-endian representations, didn't they? I can't think of a
little-endian representation, anyway.
[...]
- [Monotone-devel] Branch naming conventions, Nathaniel Smith, 2004/12/10
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Branch naming conventions, Nathan Myers, 2004/12/10
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Branch naming conventions,
Bruce Stephens <=
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Branch naming conventions, Bruce Stephens, 2004/12/11
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Branch naming conventions, Florian Weimer, 2004/12/19
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Branch naming conventions, Bruce Stephens, 2004/12/19
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Branch naming conventions, Florian Weimer, 2004/12/19
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Branch naming conventions, Bruce Stephens, 2004/12/19
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Branch naming conventions, Nathan Myers, 2004/12/12
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Branch naming conventions, Brian P. Campbell, 2004/12/12
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Branch naming conventions, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2004/12/12
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Branch naming conventions, Nathan Myers, 2004/12/12
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Branch naming conventions, Bruce Stephens, 2004/12/12