|
From: | Derek Scherger |
Subject: | Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Few remarks |
Date: | Thu, 02 Dec 2004 19:54:59 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20041108) |
graydon hoare wrote:
one stable numbering scheme which posesses the property you want (N+K is a child of N) would be to number the immediate children of *each* revision by the order they arrive in your database: consider the "first" child of N as N+1, and use a .fork.seq format for the remaining children a la CVS.first child: N+1 second child: N.1.1 third child: N.2.1
I wonder whether the length of the edge from it's root would be a reasonable facsimilie of a version number? I suppose forks would need a a.b.c type of notation and may introduce instability in the numbers though.
Cheers, Derek
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |