|
From: | David Kastrup |
Subject: | Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website] |
Date: | Sat, 04 Feb 2017 23:58:21 +0100 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes: > Am 04.02.2017 um 22:16 schrieb David Kastrup: >>> Separating website content from general documentation should definitely >>> be an option. >> What advantages do you expect from it? > > Breaking the technical tie between documentation and website makes it > possible to update the (much smaller) website independently from the > documentation system. So what updates are expected to be done by who in consequence of such a change? > Basically I have the impression that we will never change the basic > documentation system anymore because it's such a complex and > historically grown system. And everytime someone comes to us proposing > more-than-cosmetic changes they are eventually rejected because they > are not compatible with that inflexible system. So which more-than-cosmetic changes are we anticipating in consequence of a change to the website generation? -- David Kastrup
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |