[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mandatory or a cautionary accidental?
From: |
Simon Bailey |
Subject: |
Re: Mandatory or a cautionary accidental? |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Oct 2013 09:04:53 +0200 |
hi,
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Urs Liska <address@hidden> wrote:
> In the following situation is the sharp in gis' a mandatory or a cautionary
> accidental:
>
> {
>
> \key a \major
>
> g'1 ~
>
> \break
>
> g'2 gis'
>
> }
>
>
> ?
>
> Embarassingly I'm not sure about that right now but have to know.
> The original edition I'm copying omits the reminder flat after the line
> break and the sharp at the gis,
> and I've to know how to deal with the situation.
I wouldn't like to claim authoritative knowledge, but music theory i
learnt states that the note tied over keeps the alteration of before.
a new bar (for accidentals) starts _after_ any tied notes. so ignore a
tied note for accidental usage. i'd typeset a cautionary accidental.
however, baroque [and earlier] usage _may_ differ.
--
Do not meddle in the affairs of trombonists, for they are subtle and
quick to anger.
- Mandatory or a cautionary accidental?, Urs Liska, 2013/10/22
- Re: Mandatory or a cautionary accidental?, David Kastrup, 2013/10/22
- Re: Mandatory or a cautionary accidental?,
Simon Bailey <=
- Re: Mandatory or a cautionary accidental?, Urs Liska, 2013/10/22
- Re: Mandatory or a cautionary accidental?, Simon Bailey, 2013/10/22
- Re: Mandatory or a cautionary accidental?, Urs Liska, 2013/10/22
- Re: Mandatory or a cautionary accidental?, Simon Bailey, 2013/10/22
- Re: Mandatory or a cautionary accidental?, Urs Liska, 2013/10/22
- Re: Mandatory or a cautionary accidental?, Simon Bailey, 2013/10/22
- Re: Mandatory or a cautionary accidental?, Urs Liska, 2013/10/22
- Re: Mandatory or a cautionary accidental?, David Kastrup, 2013/10/22