|
From: | Philippe Massart |
Subject: | Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Portfile for Frescobaldi on Mac (Wilbert Berendsen) |
Date: | Mon, 16 Sep 2013 07:11:49 +0200 |
Hello, Before trying to find a solution to your situation (it will take some time to investigate), I think interesting to point some possible explanations about what occurred. I think that to problem comes from the coexistence of macport installed frescobaldi, and manually installed (even with with macport dependencies): some libraries (python-poppler-qt4, mainly) make a link between frescobaldi and other dependencies. If these are installed by macports, a file is created in the macport install tree. That's why it says that a file already exists when trying to activate the "macport frescobaldi". The problem is not frescobaldi itself, but the link with the dependencies. Usually, a macport message error mentions a solution: "force the activation" (something like "sudo port -f activate frescobaldi-devel). Macport then makes a copy of the former link file and allows the link between the dependencies and the "macport installed" frescobaldi (I sent a message to the list about that). Now, the errors you have when trying to open files come probably from the folders you moved. I don't remember if there is a feature like "rebuild" in macport, but the first things I would do in this case would be: - repair authorisation - re-install macport :/ (or at least remove frescobaldi (the macport version) and the dependencies you don't use (to uninstall frescobaldi and its dependencies without removing the dependencies used by other ports, I think the command looks like sudo port -fellow-dependencies frescobaldi-devel Double check in the help of macport) The idea is to really avoid touching manually the macport tree. Like you, I had a manually installed frescobaldi version; since "forcing" the activation of the portfile, my both frescobaldi install are now working: the one from macport, the other manually installed (and sync via github). Hope this could help (at least for further investigations) Philippe Le 16 sept. 2013 à 04:17, Guy Stalnaker <address@hidden> a écrit :
|
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |