Re: mea máxima culpa

[David Kastrup]

Carl Peterson <address@hidden> writes:

> This is a question of whether it makes sense from the human side or
> the computer side. From the computer side, certainly. However, adding
> a reply-to target doesn't fix that. If someone's going to reply from
> the digest, they're going to reply from the digest.

You would likely be surprised.  In the presence of a "Reply-To" header,
both the standard "Reply" and "Reply-to-all" _have_ to go to the given
address and nowhere else.  Which is why adding a "Reply-To" header is a
strong and often annoying measure.

My mail reader Gnus offers an extra obscure "Reply to mail with broken
Reply-To header" command for bypassing this, but in a web interface,
this should not be an obvious choice.

-- 
David Kastrup