|
From: | Urs Liska |
Subject: | Re: Horns example from blog |
Date: | Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:24:17 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
Am 22.02.2013 11:18, schrieb Jim Long:
Ah, that makes it clearer.On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 09:41:01AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:Jim Long <address@hidden> writes:I will say that the merging of noteheads onto stems is probably the weak spot in my knowledge.[...]The piece also generates several warnings about clashing note columns.Small wonder:\new Voice { \voiceOne \hornA } \new Voice { \voiceOne \hornB }Both with \voiceOne but in separate voices?I didn't mean to imply that it shouldn't generate those warnings, just acknowledging that the warning serve to indicate that this probably isn't "snippet-quality" code. I was trying to reproduce the example .png given in the blog, accessible at http://felixrosch.com/example.png. That example shows two grouped staves, each with two horn parts written on the same stem, as though they were a chord. If you want to achieve that result but want (obviously) to have separate voices you can write both as you did but write \override NoteColumn #'ignore-collision = ##tto suppress the warnings (which would make it more elegant). But please read HTH Urs I didn't know how else to merge the noteheads from two different voices onto a single stem. See opening disclosure. I'll try chasing down some of Xavier's clues. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list address@hidden https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |