[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Horns example from blog
From: |
Noeck |
Subject: |
Re: Horns example from blog |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:33:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
Am 22.02.2013 04:41, schrieb Jim Long:
> 1) label a staffgroup with a centered instrument name, instead of
> only being able to label each separate staff of the group;
>
> 2) splitting out separate instrument parts whilst also being able
> to flexibly combine parts on the conductor's score.
That are indeed nice LilyPond features. Before showing such a score, I
would, however, do some small changes:
- The labels should fit on the page (inside the margins -> indentation).
- The labels are too close to the staff lines.
[this could perhaps be done by default?]
- The tagline is a bit close to the scores in my opinion.
[it is sometimes useful to save vertical space, but here it is not
necessary]
What I wanted to say: When showing a LilyPond score in order to convince
somebody, it should be a really good example (proof-read by others, if
possible). This is particularly true for professionals like in this case.
Cheers,
Joram
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, (continued)
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, David Kastrup, 2013/02/21
- Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?, lilypond, 2013/02/21
- Horns example from blog, Jim Long, 2013/02/21
- Re: Horns example from blog, David Kastrup, 2013/02/22
- Re: Horns example from blog, Jim Long, 2013/02/22
- Re: Horns example from blog, Urs Liska, 2013/02/22
- Re: Horns example from blog, David Kastrup, 2013/02/22
- Re: Horns example from blog, Urs Liska, 2013/02/22
- Re: Horns example from blog, Jim Long, 2013/02/23
- Re: Horns example from blog, David Kastrup, 2013/02/22
- Re: Horns example from blog,
Noeck <=
- Re: Horns example from blog, Urs Liska, 2013/02/22
- Re: Horns example from blog, Xavier Scheuer, 2013/02/22