[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Additive time signatures
From: |
Joseph Wakeling |
Subject: |
Re: Additive time signatures |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:12:46 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) |
Kurt Kroon wrote:
>> (I'm not sure if one can extend this last one in LilyPond to more complex
>> examples, like when the numerator is an additive expression, and the
>> denominator is a single digit, e.g. (3+2+3)/8.)
>
> I was mistaken ... it *is* possible to extend the syntax (which seems
> completely reasonable, in retrospect). I've borrowed (and stretched) the
> compound-time-signature snippet as follows:
Is it possible to express time signatures so that the denominator is an
(arbitrary) _note_, as used in e.g. Orff and other contemporary
composers? e.g. 3/8 displaying as a 3 over an eighth-note/quaver.
- GDP glossary question: complex meters, Kurt Kroon, 2008/02/26
- Re: GDP glossary question: complex meters, Valentin Villenave, 2008/02/26
- RE: GDP glossary question: complex meters, Palmer, Ralph, 2008/02/26
- Re: GDP glossary question: complex meters, Kurt Kroon, 2008/02/27
- Additive time signatures (was: GDP ... complex meters), Kurt Kroon, 2008/02/28
- Re: Additive time signatures (was: GDP ... complex meters), Valentin Villenave, 2008/02/28
- Re: Additive time signatures,
Joseph Wakeling <=
- Re: Additive time signatures, Mats Bengtsson, 2008/02/28
- Re: Additive time signatures, Joseph Wakeling, 2008/02/28
- Re: Additive time signatures, Hans Aberg, 2008/02/28
- Re: Additive time signatures, Joseph Wakeling, 2008/02/28
- Re: Additive time signatures, Hans Aberg, 2008/02/28
- Re: Additive time signatures, Rune Zedeler, 2008/02/29
- Re: Additive time signatures, Hans Aberg, 2008/02/29
Re: GDP glossary question: complex meters, Anh Hai Trinh, 2008/02/28