[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
whack-a-regression
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
whack-a-regression |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Jul 2013 13:27:26 +0200 |
Hi people,
2013/7/1 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> There has been quite a lot of work on getting regressions under wrap,
> much of that by Keith. Documentation is proofread and improved.
>
>> [...]
>
> If we say "goodbye to 2.18 this year", this essentially means saying
> goodbye to stable releases forever. At the current point of time we are
> trying to play catchup with lots of regressions introduced in the 2.17
> cycle. Some of that is due to shoddy work that did not receive the
> right amount of scrutiny in reviews or otherwise before getting
> committed.
i've decided that instead of complaining about slowed development
process, i can do some bug-fixing instead.
What would you like me to do?
I can promise 8-12 hours of work, in blocks 2-4 hours long, during the
next few days - maybe more, if i get hooked ;)
What i'd like to ask in return is that someone will be working
together with me, and that we'll have real-time chat to answer each
other's questions. I'm _not_ going to do regression fixing alone,
because i consider this a waste of time due to my insufficient
programming skills.
cheers,
Janek
- whack-a-regression,
Janek Warchoł <=