[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting pa
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10? |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Feb 2013 18:19:02 +0100 |
On 8 févr. 2013, at 16:57, Xavier Scheuer <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 8 February 2013 09:27, address@hidden <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> (snip)
>>
>> It's gonna take me some time to have a look at it - I'll do my best to check
>> it out on Sunday.
>
> Is this related to the not-yet-added-to-the-tracker "chord name collide
> with staff" issue?
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2013-02/msg00019.html
>
> Should Trevor's report be added to the tracker?
>
> Cheers,
> Xavier
The two problems are related but not identical. The problem here is that
skyline.cc uses an EPS value to weed out too-tiny buildings. This means that a
skyline that has tiny extents (including 0) for its elements could turn out
empty. That causes the new skyline code to puke because it does not know how
to measure distance between an empty skyline and a non-empty skyline (or an
empty vs empty for that matter).
Running regtests now on a solution, but Joe's input would be good. I only got
rid of EPS in skyline.cc where it causes problems in this particular instance,
but perhaps it'd be a good idea to get rid of it all together.
Cheers,
MS
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, (continued)
Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, Keith OHara, 2013/02/07
- Message not available
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, Keith OHara, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, David Kastrup, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, address@hidden, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, David Kastrup, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, address@hidden, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, Trevor Bača, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, Xavier Scheuer, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?,
address@hidden <=
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, David Kastrup, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, address@hidden, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, address@hidden, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, David Kastrup, 2013/02/09
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, address@hidden, 2013/02/09
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, Keith OHara, 2013/02/09
Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, address@hidden, 2013/02/08
Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, David Kastrup, 2013/02/08
Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, Trevor Bača, 2013/02/08
Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, David Kastrup, 2013/02/08