[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting pa
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10? |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Feb 2013 08:57:08 +0100 |
On 8 févr. 2013, at 08:45, "Keith OHara" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 20:56:06 -0800, Trevor Bača <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Keith OHara <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> Trevor Bača <trevorbaca <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>> > Did VerticalAxisGroup's default-staff-staff-spacing property stop
>>> > respecting the 'padding' attribute between 2.17.9 and 2.17.10?
>>> >
>>> > I ask because I use a custom time signature context in my scores.
>>>
>>> No, padding still works. The latest LilyPond misunderstood what you
>>> want with the zero-dimension TimeSignature.
>
>>
>> Good point. I set zero-extent time signatures so that the notes in the
>> score will be positioned exactly where they are supposed to begin when
>> proportional notation is turned on. (You can see this in the small PNGs
>> sent along with the original post.) With nonzero-extent time signatures we
>> wind up with notes being pushed slightly to the right of where they should
>> begin in order to accommodate the X-extent of time signatures that come
>> between notes.
>
>> Other than that there's no particular allure to the zero-extent time
>> signatures: they're just the mechanism I was best able to use to achieve
>> the precision of horizontal layout. Quite happy to solve the problem a
>> different way if some newer mechanism is recommended.
>
> Probably you should adjust your solution, because Mike's next patch
> completely removes lines of music that have only zero-size extents.
It removes vertical axis groups with empty skylines.
Cheers,
MS
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, (continued)
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, address@hidden, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, Trevor Bača, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, Xavier Scheuer, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, address@hidden, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, David Kastrup, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, address@hidden, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, address@hidden, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, David Kastrup, 2013/02/09
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, address@hidden, 2013/02/09
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, Keith OHara, 2013/02/09
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?,
address@hidden <=
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, David Kastrup, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, Trevor Bača, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, David Kastrup, 2013/02/08
- Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?, Trevor Bača, 2013/02/08