[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What's the deal with the LSR update?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: What's the deal with the LSR update? |
Date: |
Sun, 01 Jan 2012 20:37:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> git grep automatically-change-duration
>>> Documentation/snippets/rhythms.snippet-list:automatically-change-durations.ly
>>> address@hidden:/usr/local/tmp/lilypond$ find -name
>>> automatically-change-duration.ly
>>> address@hidden:/usr/local/tmp/lilypond$
>>
>>
>> Looks like that was a snippet added to the docs and wasn't included in
>> the patch because I didn't add new files to the patch - only changed
>> ones. Please let me know how you want to fix this.
>
> I'll remove that particular patch from staging. I propose that we'll
> use the opportunity for redoing this completely by first letting me push
> a patch copying the snippets from me that don't survive the automatic
> update into snippets/new, and that you then restart the snippet update
> from that state.
>
> In that manner we should be able to avoid the snippets I changed
> incorrectly to jump back and forth.
Done, so let's see if this gets through to master, and if it does, you
might want to try the LSR updating procedure again.
> If you want a "fresh build directory check", you might want to use
>
> git clean
>
> which removes everything not under control of git.
--
David Kastrup
Re: What's the deal with the LSR update?, Phil Holmes, 2012/01/01