|
From: | John Calcote |
Subject: | Re: What happened to libtool transitive DSOs? |
Date: | Thu, 21 Jun 2018 10:05:21 -0600 |
On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, John Calcote wrote:
>
> After upgrading to libtool 2.4.2, I find that I now have to specify the
> additional secondary .la files that are listed in the primary .la files'
> dependency_libs property, or I get a link error indicating missing DSOs on
> the command line (and I can see that libtool is not adding the transitive
> dependencies like it used to. Why was this change made?
Are you using libtool 2.4.2 as distributed by the FSF or are you using
a modified libtool distributed by an OS vendor? Some OS vendors
modify libtool like this on purpose.
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |