Re: [Libcdio-devel] Inline getopt copy creating problems

[Peter Creath]

On 3/9/07, Burkhard Plaum <address@hidden> wrote:
> If cdio contains a getopt() implementation anyway, why not rename it to
> cdio_getopt() and use this exclusively? This means less bloat and things
> will work like they do now.

Excellent suggestion.  It's also clearer.

Diego, thanks for clarifying -- that doesn't sound like it would cause
the problem I mentioned.