Re: [Koha-devel] last chat, koha 3.0, synching of dev_week/head & branches

[Chris Cormack]

> *********
> QUESTION
> *********
> We decided during the meeting to :
> - branch head => rel_3
> - synch dev_week with rel_3
> - stabilize rel_3
> - let head staying unstable, tumer having many ideas (full XML, 
> XSLT...), that could be tested here.
> 
> I was wondering if it would not be better to :
> - synch dev_week and head
> - immediatly branch rel_3 when the synch is done
> - stabilize rel_3 for Koha 3 & let head unstable
> 
> That would let head with dev_week zebra integrated. Otherwise, i'm 
> afraid someone (tumer ?) will have to merge dev_week with head anyway, 
> to add zebra support
> 
I think the idea was that we didnt want the dev_week stuff in head, as its
quite different from how Tumer plans to build the API and code for 3.2

And if we merged dev_week to head then branched rel_3_0, we would then have
to remove a bunch of stuff from head in the course of Tumers work.

Tumer please correct me if I'm wrong

Chris
-- 
Chris Cormack                                                     Programmer
027 4500 789                                       Katipo Communications Ltd
address@hidden                                          www.katipo.co.nz