[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: CVS and unicode
From: |
Yves Dorfsman |
Subject: |
RE: CVS and unicode |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Sep 2005 08:56:04 -0600 (MDT) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.5 |
> In CVS a Unicode file has to be a Binary file (-kb) - which prevents
> merging, diffs, etc etc. If you do not define it as -kb then eventually
> the file will be corrupted.
Makes sense.
> CVSNT for Linux/Unix/Mac/Windows is free (GPL - just like CVS) but
> supports the -ku type (unicode) which allows efficient storage, diff's,
> merges etc - just like a text file but as unicode.
> http://march-hare.com/cvspro/
>
> If you run the CVSNT server in unicode mode (still a little
> experimental) then the server and client will translate the filenames
> between the server and client codepages.
Any reason why the GNU CVS project is staying away from integratig unicode ?
Is this intentional, or just because nobody's done it ?
Would it'd be worth starting to work on this ?
Yves.
----
Yves Dorfsman address@hidden
http://www.cuug.ab.ca/dorfsmay
http://www.SollerS.ca
- Re: CVS and unicode, (continued)
- Re: CVS and unicode, Spiro Trikaliotis, 2005/09/11
- Re: CVS and unicode, Christian Hujer, 2005/09/11
- Re: CVS and unicode, Jim Hyslop, 2005/09/12
- Re: CVS and unicode, Christian Hujer, 2005/09/12
- Re: CVS and unicode, Jim Hyslop, 2005/09/12
- Message not available
- Re: CVS and unicode, Pierre Asselin, 2005/09/11
- Re: CVS and unicode, Larry Jones, 2005/09/12
- Re: CVS and unicode, Derek Price, 2005/09/12
- Re: CVS and unicode, Christian Hujer, 2005/09/12
RE: CVS and unicode, Arthur Barrett, 2005/09/05
- RE: CVS and unicode,
Yves Dorfsman <=
RE: CVS and unicode, Arthur Barrett, 2005/09/06
RE: CVS and unicode, Arthur Barrett, 2005/09/07
Re: CVS and unicode, ai26, 2005/09/10
RE: CVS and unicode, Arthur Barrett, 2005/09/12