[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVS and unicode
From: |
Sergei Organov |
Subject: |
Re: CVS and unicode |
Date: |
06 Sep 2005 19:29:28 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) |
Yves Dorfsman <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
> I have made a few tests (with UTF8) and so far it worked, but some of
> my users are saying they did run into problem with some files. I can
> see how some legal UTF8 characters could be confused as control
> code/binary.
>From man unicode:
UCS/Unicode can be used just like ASCII in input/output
streams, terminal communication, plaintext files, file-
names, and environment variables in the ASCII compatible
UTF-8 multi-byte encoding.
Could you please explain which legal UTF8 characters could be confused
as control code/binary?
-- Sergei.
- CVS and unicode, Yves Dorfsman, 2005/09/05
- Re: CVS and unicode,
Sergei Organov <=
- Re: CVS and unicode, Christian Hujer, 2005/09/07
- Re: CVS and unicode, Arno Schuring, 2005/09/08
- Re: CVS and unicode, Christian Hujer, 2005/09/10
- Re: CVS and unicode, Spiro Trikaliotis, 2005/09/10
- Re: CVS and unicode, Christian Hujer, 2005/09/10
- Message not available
- Re: CVS and unicode, Pierre Asselin, 2005/09/10
- Re: CVS and unicode, Christian Hujer, 2005/09/11
- Re: CVS and unicode, Spiro Trikaliotis, 2005/09/11
- Re: CVS and unicode, Christian Hujer, 2005/09/11
- Re: CVS and unicode, Larry Jones, 2005/09/11