[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gzz] Pegboard
From: |
Tuomas Lukka |
Subject: |
Re: [Gzz] Pegboard |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Aug 2002 08:07:12 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 12:24:33AM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On 20020825T184741+0200, Benja Fallenstein wrote:
> > - Bugs (non-conformance with javadoc/failing tests-- can happen in the
> > abstract impls etc.) should be fixable.
>
> Some projects require all patches that fix bugs in frozen and stable
> code to be posted to a mailing list, inspected and discussed before
> committing them. I think it would be a good practice.
I think that would be too much at this point. You should never take more
bureucracy than you absolutely need.
Once there are >5 active contributors, *then* this would be reasonable.
Besides, we have gzz-commits mailing list.
Tuomas
- [Gzz] Pegboard, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/08/25
- Re: [Gzz] Pegboard, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/08/25
- Re: [Gzz] Pegboard, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/08/25
- Re: [Gzz] Pegboard, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2002/08/25
- Re: [Gzz] Pegboard, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/08/26
- Re: [Gzz] Pegboard, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/08/26
- syncmail (was: Re: [Gzz] Pegboard), Benja Fallenstein, 2002/08/26
- Re: syncmail (was: Re: [Gzz] Pegboard), Tuomas Lukka, 2002/08/26
- Re: syncmail (was: Re: [Gzz] Pegboard), Benja Fallenstein, 2002/08/26
- Re: syncmail (was: Re: [Gzz] Pegboard), Tuomas Lukka, 2002/08/26