[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Plan for 0.9.0
From: |
Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer |
Subject: |
Re: Plan for 0.9.0 |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:30:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Mathieu Lirzin <address@hidden> writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Alex Vong <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Regarding gc, I remember I accidentally ran "guix gc" and removed all
>>> the build dependencies like bash, glibc... Then, I realized the proper
>>> way to run gc is to run "guix gc -d <DIRECTORY>". Perhaps we should
>>> change the command for garbage collecting everything from "guix gc" to
>>> "guix gc -a" and "guix gc --all". Does this sound reasonable?
>>
>> I think this is not a bad idea. It would also make “guix gc” behave
>> more like the other sub-commands (i.e. require an argument).
>>
>> It’s not a command that’s used so often that the additional argument
>> would hurt much, in my opinion.
>
> This makes sense to me too.
+1 from me too, since accidentally GC'ing things can be annoying,
although the flags --gc-keep-outputs --gc-keep-derivations to
guix-daemon help in that regard.
Taylan
- Plan for 0.9.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/10/12
- Re: Plan for 0.9.0, Daniel Pimentel, 2015/10/13
- Re: Plan for 0.9.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/10/14
- Re: Plan for 0.9.0, Mathieu Lirzin, 2015/10/14
- Re: Plan for 0.9.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/10/14
- Re: Plan for 0.9.0, Eric Bavier, 2015/10/14
- Re: Plan for 0.9.0, Mathieu Lirzin, 2015/10/15
- Re: Plan for 0.9.0, Thompson, David, 2015/10/15
- Re: Plan for 0.9.0, Mathieu Lirzin, 2015/10/15
- Re: Plan for 0.9.0, Thompson, David, 2015/10/15
- Re: Plan for 0.9.0, Daniel Pimentel, 2015/10/15
- Re: Plan for 0.9.0, Christopher Allan Webber, 2015/10/15