Re: Plan for 0.9.0

[Mathieu Lirzin]

Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> writes:

> Alex Vong <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Regarding gc, I remember I accidentally ran "guix gc" and removed all
>> the build dependencies like bash, glibc... Then, I realized the proper
>> way to run gc is to run "guix gc -d <DIRECTORY>". Perhaps we should
>> change the command for garbage collecting everything from "guix gc" to
>> "guix gc -a" and "guix gc --all". Does this sound reasonable?
>
> I think this is not a bad idea.  It would also make “guix gc” behave
> more like the other sub-commands (i.e. require an argument).
>
> It’s not a command that’s used so often that the additional argument
> would hurt much, in my opinion.

This makes sense to me too.

--
Mathieu Lirzin