[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Modified load-path proposal
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: Modified load-path proposal |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Oct 2005 05:55:37 -0500 |
From: Neil Jerram <address@hidden>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 22:59:32 +0000
Not sure what you mean by "to get around it". Do you mean that
someone will change the design so that the interface does the
enforcement itself; or that if the interface is precise about what it
allows, someone will want to change it to be more permissive in future?
both interpretations are fine.
perlis?
google?
thi
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, (continued)
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Greg Troxel, 2005/10/13
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Andreas Rottmann, 2005/10/13
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/15
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Greg Troxel, 2005/10/15
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/15
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Kevin Ryde, 2005/10/22
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/28
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/30
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2005/10/30
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/30
- Re: Modified load-path proposal,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Tomas Zerolo, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Kevin Ryde, 2005/10/30
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Tomas Zerolo, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Kevin Ryde, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/15
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Greg Troxel, 2005/10/15
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/15
Re: Modified load-path proposal, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/14