[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Modified load-path proposal
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: Modified load-path proposal |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Oct 2005 15:37:33 -0500 |
From: Neil Jerram <address@hidden>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 18:04:58 +0000
We could enforce this by [...]
I'd appreciate hearing your thoughts (again).
if your design requires enforcement, someone will want to
redesign it later to get around it. you might as well
put yourself in the third-party-programmer's shoes from
the beginning. perlis sez: simplicty follows complexity.
thi
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, (continued)
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Greg Troxel, 2005/10/13
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/13
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Greg Troxel, 2005/10/13
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Andreas Rottmann, 2005/10/13
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/15
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Greg Troxel, 2005/10/15
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/15
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Kevin Ryde, 2005/10/22
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/28
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/30
- Re: Modified load-path proposal,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/30
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Tomas Zerolo, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Kevin Ryde, 2005/10/30
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Tomas Zerolo, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Kevin Ryde, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/15
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Greg Troxel, 2005/10/15