[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gettext: commands/*
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: gettext: commands/* |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Dec 2009 22:03:23 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:17:22AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 01:16:04PM +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder'
>> Serbinenko wrote:
>>> === modified file 'commands/halt.c'
>>> --- commands/halt.c 2009-12-03 23:07:29 +0000
>>> +++ commands/halt.c 2009-12-21 00:10:33 +0000
>>> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static grub_command_t cmd;
>>> GRUB_MOD_INIT(halt)
>>> {
>>> cmd = grub_register_command ("halt", grub_cmd_halt,
>>> - 0, "halts the computer. This command does not"
>>> + 0, "Halts the computer. This command does not"
>>> " work on all firmware.");
>>> I would rather say "On *every* firmware."
>>
>> That doesn't sound grammatical to this native speaker, because you use
>> "every" with singular count nouns and "firmware" isn't pluralisable -
>> I'm not sure of its exact grammatical category but it feels like a mass
>> noun to me. Besides, "does not work on all" feels more idiomatically
>> correct than "does not work on every".
>>
>> "All firmware" is definitely better, but you could use "all firmware
>> implementations" if you wanted to be crystal-clear.
>
> I believe it would be also correct to say
>
> This command does not work on some firmware implementations.
Or maybe we could speak a language a bit closer to the user and say that
this command doesn't work on all computers? :-)
--
Robert Millan
"Be the change you want to see in the world" -- Gandhi