[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] SlugGo v.s. Many Faces
From: |
David G Doshay |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] SlugGo v.s. Many Faces |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 10:20:00 -0700 |
On Aug 24, 2004, at 8:03 PM, Gunnar Farnebäck wrote:
Arend wrote:
I think an improvement of 2 stones with only 18 times as much
computing
time is impressive and very promising. Congratulations.
Well, there's some parallelism too. As I understood it the factor 18
referred to wall time, not computing time.
That is correct. The compute time is as much as 8 times that right now,
but that factor of 8 is done in parallel over 8 cpus. This is why it
would
be so painfully slow on a single cpu machine.
And if I may be so bold, I think the total improvement is better than 2
stones. GNU Go usually looses to Many Faces. We will know more
as statistics build up.
David
Re: [gnugo-devel] SlugGo v.s. Many Faces, Douglas Ridgway, 2004/08/24
Re: [gnugo-devel] SlugGo v.s. Many Faces, Marco Scheurer, 2004/08/24
Re: [gnugo-devel] SlugGo v.s. Many Faces, David G Doshay, 2004/08/24
Re: [gnugo-devel] SlugGo v.s. Many Faces, Marco Scheurer, 2004/08/24
Re: [gnugo-devel] SlugGo v.s. Many Faces, David G Doshay, 2004/08/24
Re: [gnugo-devel] SlugGo v.s. Many Faces, Marco Scheurer, 2004/08/25
Re: [gnugo-devel] SlugGo v.s. Many Faces, max-d, 2004/08/25
Re: [gnugo-devel] SlugGo v.s. Many Faces, David G Doshay, 2004/08/25
Re: [gnugo-devel] SlugGo v.s. Many Faces, Arend Bayer, 2004/08/25
Re: [gnugo-devel] SlugGo v.s. Many Faces, David G Doshay, 2004/08/25
Re: [gnugo-devel] SlugGo v.s. Many Faces, Arend Bayer, 2004/08/25