[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch moves to GPL v3 or later
|
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch moves to GPL v3 or later |
|
Date: |
Sat, 8 Sep 2007 16:41:29 +0200 (CEST) |
> In either case, Arch is already incompatible with the licenseing terms
> of Linux. Linux is licensed under the GPLv2 only, while Arch is
> licensed under GPLv2 or later.
Wrong. At present, Arch can incorporate Linux code, and vice versa,
No, not at all, the license conditions for arch are _or_later_, these
are terms different than those for Linux, so you _CANNOT_ incoperate
changes from Arch into Linux. The GPL states that the license terms
must be the same, since they are not, the two licenses are not
compatible.
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch moves to GPL v3 or later, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch moves to GPL v3 or later, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/09/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch moves to GPL v3 or later,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch moves to GPL v3 or later, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/09/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch moves to GPL v3 or later, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch moves to GPL v3 or later, Thomas Lord, 2007/09/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch moves to GPL v3 or later, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/14
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch moves to GPL v3 or later, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/09/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch moves to GPL v3 or later, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/18
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch moves to GPL v3 or later, Thomas Lord, 2007/09/07